Undervalued property of the human brain, which isĪutomatic decluttering, forgotting and blending out That said, Emacs also makes fantastic use of a Good fraction of what is relevant to certain It takes some amount of conscious effort to learn a Is certainly a lot of stuff one can learn, so much that While basic commands are not that hard to learn, there To think about it, because it can warn you before To recognize the tone of that, and to listen to it, and Obstacles to competitor languages / systems, Inacceptable spyware, waste of attention, artificial Strings attached are less visible - like "telemetrics", Successes, so companies are trying to jump onto thatīandwagon, but this has mainly the consequence that the Not just "open source" but really free software, with The most important advantage of Emacs and vi are, theseĪre open systems, which come out of an open culture, In fact, I will consider a language "niche" until it gets proper JetBrains support for the above reasons. Those editors are in fact a "lowest common denominator", and people lose so much productivity because of them. The JetBrains IDEs are MILES ahead of what Vim, Emacs or Visual Studio Code can do with their hodge-podge of plugins that I would never trust with a context-aware automatic refactor in my life. It is unfortunate though that many communities only focus on getting those type of setups working well. In conclusion: Vim and Emacs do win in ubiquity for sure. The language plugins do usually leverage community tools when possible, but sometimes it is prohibitively expensive performance-wise. I wish more framework/language communities would take developing a JetBrains plugin more seriously. The most popular frameworks will usually have an official plugin. Yes, some frameworks are not fully supported, which is inevitable. Either you turn Pycharm into something that does not work good for anyone (lowest common denominator) or you have to leave out communities. > I'm convinced this comes from the fact that IDEs have to be both highly opinionated and very flexible: supporting all of flask, django, pandas+Jupyter and ansible, properly, is tough: all are Python, all are really different. The Rust plugin is not ideal yet, although it is officially supported so in time it will probably have the same support and quality other products have. I generally edit almost all my files in a JetBains IDE, heavily using the "scratch" feature. There are very high quality third party plugins for everything you mentioned except maybe Latex? HTML support is built-in for sure in all the web-focused IDEs (pycharm, rubymine, phpstorm, webstorm). Still, there seems no JetBrains for Bash, ansible(yaml), HTML, Latex, Rust (though there is a plugin), or markdown.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |